A Blog by Jonathan Low

 

Oct 11, 2011

Unhealthy Alternatives: 'Sugar Free' Drinks and Gum Contain Hidden Risks...But Will Anyone Care?

Scientists have for years contested the notion that diet drinks and gum help keep weight off. Now, new reports are suggesting that these products contain more insidious threats to health.

If past is prologue, the soda and gum companies will trot out their own experts to dispute the warnings and reassure a public that, frankly, welcomes the reassurance. Because research also suggests that people are trying to assuage their guilt about indulgence as much as they are attempting to actually do something about their weight.

So the broader issue is about communication and honesty and ethics. The tobacco companies were shown to be lying and covering up evidence about the dangers of their products - but many people still smoke. Meat, farmed salmon, eggs and a host of other foodstuffs been accused of contributing to health risks over the years. But the problem is that as a civilization, we value simple solutions. Too busy or lazy to exercise? Chew sugar free gum. Health care costs are exploding and insurance is becoming unaffordable. Data about obesity is everywhere - but habits die hard. Marketers are meeting demand. People have knowledge but ignore it. The societal issue seems to be that beliefs are more powerful than information. And that the consequences only happen to someone else. JL

Denis Campbell reports in The Guardian:
Sugar-free gum, sweets and soft drinks, marketed as healthy alternatives to sugary products, can damage teeth, cause gastric problems and are unlikely to promote weight loss, research claims.

A study review in the British Dental Journal (BDJ) found that sugar-free foods and drinks contain acidic additives that may cause dental problems by eroding the enamel on consumers' teeth.
Disclosure of what the authors call a "hidden risk" could affect sales of sugar-free products, especially given what the paper describes as consumers' blind confidence in such products as a good thing.

The paper, Are sugar-free confections really beneficial for dental health?, examined the role of sugar substitutes used in products to reduce the risk of tooth decay. While one commonly used group of substitutes, called sugar alcohols, or polyols, do lessen the risk of cavities, they can cause acidity in the mouth that then leads to erosion of teeth enamel, says the paper.

These substitutes include xylitol, which the European commission has allowed to market itself as a "tooth friendly" ingredient in chewing gum. Xylitol is widely-used in sugar-free products sold in the UK.

The literature review, by academics from the universities of Boston, Helsinki and Southern Nevada, concludes: "As the use of sorbitol and xylitol containing products increases, the public should be educated on the hidden risk of dental erosion due to acidic additives, as well as the adverse effects of gastric disturbance and osmotic diarrhoea. Especially in sugar-free products, these adverse effects may be more insidious because the public has blind confidence that they are oral health friendly."

It adds: "Although the presence of acidic flavourings and preservatives in sugar-free products has received less attention, these additives may have adverse dental health effects, such as dental erosion. Furthermore, the term sugar-free may generate false security because people may automatically believe that sugar-free products are safe on teeth."

The review raises the wider question of what health-related claims made on behalf of products can be trusted, said Stephen Hancocks, the BDJ's editor-in-chief. "The claim might well mean what it says and be suitably backed-up by research evidence, but does it fully say what it means, or alternatively, what is it not saying? Sugar-free may seem to indicate that a sweet or other product is tooth friendly, but this is not automatically the case," he wrote in a commentary on the findings.

Given sugar-free products' role in erosion of dental enamel, and doubts over perceptions of them as helping users to consume fewer calories, he continued, "the result is a minefield of confusion for the patient who is trying his or her very best to comply with healthy choices and a complex labyrinth of communication for the professional in attempting to convey practical advice."

Professor Damien Walmsley, scientific adviser to the British Dental Association, which represents dentists, said excess use of sugar-free products containing fruit flavourings could rot the enamel covering the dentine in teeth and ultimately cause teeth to dissolve.

0 comments:

Post a Comment