A Blog by Jonathan Low

 

May 15, 2015

Is the Cloud Becoming As Transformational As the PC?

Distributing access and power to build value. Focusing on services rather than hardware in order to keep costs manageable while more efficiently and productively placing the creative processes in the hands of users rather than providers.

Sound familiar? It should. Because that describes the process by which technology is metamorphosizing - again - as powerful tools and the authority to use them are being disbursed at scale in an effort to increase the rate at which co-evolutionary development expands both the market and the value it is creating.

The cloud exemplifies this process but its roots are in the PC. The network may have been the computer (not that it did much good for Sun Microsystems) but the dispersal of the license to animate the void was the revolutionary concept that began the current wave of transformation. Adding value by sharing it out rather than hoarding has twice been the key to exponential growth. Which leads us to wonder what it will look like the next time. JL

Greg Satell comments in Digital Tonto:

The cloud might be the most disruptive technology ever. (Its) services are highly distributed, making it easy (to) get access as large scale enterprises do.Much like the PC business back in the 90’s, most of the value will be in software and services, not hardware.
It’s earnings season again and Amazon, for the first time ever, has broken out the financial results of its cloud services division, Amazon Web Services (AWS).  The results  are impressive.  In less than a decade, Amazon has grown AWS into a $5 billion business that is still growing at 50%.
Yet even more impressive—and strangely unnoticed—is that IBM cloud services is now a $7.7 billion business growing at 75%, according to IBM CFO Martin Schroeter’s prepared remarks during the company’s recent earnings call.  Even for Big Blue, that’s a big business.
Amazon and IBM run vastly different operations, so making a direct comparison between the two announcements isn’t exactly apples to apples.  Still, I think two things are clear.  First, the cloud is becoming an absolutely massive business.  Second, that much like the PC business back in the 90’s, most of the value will be in software and services, not hardware.

How Amazon Created The Massive Market For Cloud Services

Amazon Web Services was officially launched in 2006, but the seed of the idea came three years before.  As Benjamin Black describes in his blog, at the time he was working on infrastructure with his manager, Chris Pinkham, when the the two developed a vision for how the could completely standardize and automate Amazon’s server infrastructure.
They took the concept to Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos who liked the idea a lot.  As a matter of fact, he liked it so much that he thought that he could make a business out of it.  Surely, if Amazon found the technology useful, other companies would also.  He was right and when the service launched it became a runaway success.
Today, AWS has more than 1 million business customers ranging from Netflix and Expedia to startups most people have never heard of.  When Healthcare.gov ran into highly publicized problems during its launch, it moved parts of the website to Amazon.  Even the CIA recently signed a contract for Amazon to design and build a $600 million custom cloud for it.
Yet as I noted a while back, Amazon’s low cost, low margin approach has its limits.  While the company is incredibly innovative, it often attracts competition that not only squeezes its margins, but eventually outperform it.  That’s seems to be what’s happening now as AWS’s infrastructure as a service is being outpaced by higher value services.
And the early leader appears to be, believe it or not, IBM.

An Old Approach Becomes New Again

In 1981, IBM launched the PC, which became an almost immediate success.  Its open approach allowed the company to shoot past Apple and create an entirely new industry.  Yet as it turned out, the real value of the computer age turned out to lie not hardware, but software.  Before long, Microsoft emerged as the world’s most powerful technology company.
By the end of the decade, IBM was faltering.  Many industry observers thought the company should be broken up and when Louis Gerstner was named CEO in 1993, that’s what most people expected him to do.  Yet he didn’t.  Instead, he leveraged IBM’s enormous footprint to create a fabulous business in services.
In a sense, Amazon Web Services today is very much like IBM’s PC business back in the eighties.  Two years ago, IBM bought a similar business, Softlayer, which at the time was a rising player in the cloud market that competed directly with Amazon.  In a sense, this is similar to some of the moves Hewlett Packard made a generation ago.
Yet this time, IBM would not make the mistake of focusing on hardware to the exclusion of software.  Last year, it launched Bluemix as a “platform as a service,” designed to allow developers to access all aspects of the cloud, including infrastructure, software and services. It also quickly moved to offer many of its existing products as “software as a service.”
Incidentally, Microsoft has a very similar strategy with its Azure offering.  Its recently reported $6.3 billion in cloud revenues are second only to IBM.  Unlike in the PC era, however, Redmond won’t have the market all to itself.

An App Store At Enterprise Scale

When people buy mobile phones, they are looking not only at the handset itself, but what applications it can access.  IBM sees its cloud business in a similar way and is looking to leverage its unique offering of hardware, software and business services.  In a sense, IBM is creating an app store for the cloud at enterprise scale.
Angel Diaz, Vice President of Cloud Architecture and Technology at IBM told me, “We’re moving to a world where applications are being integrated to create new products and services.  We see our cloud business as empowering our customers to innovate, adapt and go to market with integrated services that change and adapt quickly.”
So for IBM, the cloud is vastly more than infrastructure, which is likely to be commoditized over time.  An IBM client can access and integrate third party applications such SAP enterprise software, but also data and analytics packages honed through its Smarter Planet initiative, cognitive computing through Watson and other software services.
Or, alternatively, a client can choose another partner for low cost infrastructure, but still use IBM exclusively for the high value services.  Either way, it’s a great business.

The Cloud Disruption

As I argued in an previous article, the cloud might be the most disruptive technology ever.  Earlier technologies had a centralized architecture, which meant that they were expensive to install, maintain and update.  Cloud based services, on the other hand, are highly distributed, making it easy for even startup companies get similar access as large scale enterprises do.
And the potential is enormous.  Not only is the market estimated to rise to $286 billion by 2018, but it represents an entirely new era of computing.  As  IBM’s Diaz puts it “it’s a whole new level of technological capability, which means an entirely new era of business innovation that will most likely dwarf what we saw with the arrival of the commercial web.”
So in a very real sense, we are in a situation much like the PC era in the eighties.  IBM leads now, but that could change.  Amazon, Microsoft and others are also building exciting businesses with high margins that are growing at an astounding rate.  What’s more, that pace is likely to continue for over the medium term.
So perhaps we should pay less attention to the horse race and take a moment to appreciate the phenomenon itself.  Much like a generation ago, we are entering a new era of computing and, just like back then, it will change everything.

6 comments:

Decisionscience said...

Hey Jon,

The article you've reposted above would appear to read hardware is bad, hardware is bad, hardware is bad - BUT cloud is good - EVEN THOUGH CLOUD IS MAINLY HARDWARE, and an extreme version of it at that.

Not only that, but the implications presented run entirely contrary to Bloomberg's report (http://bv.ms/1Fo3hPc) which tells us that Amazon is running 3x ahead of its nearest competitor(s IBM and Microsoft) in cloud services. Not just ahead, mind you but 3X ahead.

Finally, an intro to the Bloomberg data on LinkedIn (http://linkd.in/1ebgPn3) at reminds us that both Microsoft and IBM were (or at least thought they were) at the "forefront" of smartphone market until they were unceremoniously deposed by Apple, and for a reason which is being re-echoed in Diaz' statement in the article (that you quoted above) on how the cloud represents "an entirely new era of BUSINESS innovation".

I'm sorry but what you have posted above has very little credibility and looks a LOT like revisionist history that was bought and paid for by IBM.

I'd be curious to know what you were really thinking.

Jon Low said...

Hey, thanks for your note. My purpose was definitely NOT to proclaim that hardware is evil and the cloud is god-like - nor do I interpret Greg Satell's article that way. My intention was to point out first that distributed power, as represented by the PC, was a substantial breakthrough that provided significant impetus to the growth of technology. My question is whether the cloud will play the same role or not. There is some evidence that it might, though I acknowledge that others believe this is actually a re-centralization of authority - especially given the histories and cultures of Microsoft, IBM and Amazon.

As for the competition between the three, it is not yet apparent to me that MSFT can catch up with the rest of the industry anytime soon. IBM is clearly struggling - again - but they have metamorphosized before and may have yet more rabbits to pull out of that hat. Amazon is clearly dominant now but as we have seen before in tech, the seeds of an enterprise's undoing often lie within its success.

I view hardware and software as both co-evolutionary and co-dependent so the big issue is who will next optimize that combination to greatest advantage. Thanks again for your thoughts, hope this makes mine clearer - Jon

Anonymous said...

Hi Jon,

> My question is whether the cloud will play the same role (e.g. convey distributed power) or not.

There is no question that cloud technology has the potential and will in fact serve to empower those who would have up until now had to seek mediation from entities with greater power, influence, and capital to risk.

The reason that Amazon is so far ahead of MSFT and IBM in this game is precisely because this is the business model it is facilitating whereas it is the re-centralized model that IBM is banking on (MSFT appears ambivalent) - which is why this article, in which Satell spends most of his effort to cheerlead IBM's wrongheaded attempts to reconstitute it's past glory, is such a poor representation of what is most likely to take financial as well as influential precedence as the future unfolds.

Amazon may or may not stay in the lead and may yield to competitors hitherto unknown, much as the iPhone has yielded (and will likely continue to yield) to comparative newcomer Android on a per capita basis, but the die is cast and the empowerment model will overcome the centralized mediation model as it has in PCs, in phones, and in all the other examples that Clay Christensen was so kind as to make us more fully aware of.

Thanks again & take care.

ITBMO said...

I got some valuable points through this blog. Cloud Financial Management

ENTHRAL said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
ITGOLD Solutions said...

The given information was excellent and useful.Cloud Computing Brisbane

Post a Comment