A Blog by Jonathan Low

 

Sep 18, 2016

Why Google and Facebook Are Urging Congress To Hand Over Internet Control

Google, Facebook et al are under attack all over the world, but especially in Europe and Asia, where the perception is that the US has too much control over the workings of the internet.

Ceding authority over ICANN is not perceived by big tech to be essential to the companies' business interests and might relieve regulatory pressure over the stuff that effects the really important matters, like revenue growth and profits. JL

Steve Dent reports in Engadget:

Congress is not happy about it. The mostly Republican lawmakers feel that ceding control will stifle online freedom and give power to authoritarian governments. (But) many nations are understandably skittish about full US control over what is, after all, the "World Wide Web." Tech companies wrote that it's "imperative" that Congress not hold it up. "A global Internet is essential for our economic and national security ... [a] model that will best serve U.S. interests."
On October 1st, the US is supposed to hand the "keys" of the internet to ICANN, and Congress is not happy about it. The mostly Republican lawmakers, led by Ted Cruz, feel that ceding control will stifle online freedom and give power to authoritarian governments. However, technology companies including Facebook, Google and Twitter penned an open letter to Congress, urging lawmakers to hand internet domain control to the international community as promised.
The final proposal, drafted by "proud and active members of the internet community," goes well beyond the US Commerce Department's original criteria, set in 2014, according to the document. "Furthermore, crucial safeguards are in place to protect human rights, including the freedom of speech," it adds.
A global, interoperable and stable Internet is essential for our economic and national security, and we remain committed to completing the nearly twenty year transition to ... [a] model that will best serve U.S. interests.
The internet is currently controlled by the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA), and has been since its birth. However, many nations are understandably skittish about full US control over what is, after all, the "World Wide Web." As such, the US agreed to cede control to ICANN, an international body with representatives from academia, government agencies like NASA, corporations and protocol bodies like the Internet Systems Consortium.
Cruz grill(ed) the NTIA and ICANN on whether they're fully prepared to deal with censorship attempts by China, Russia and other authoritarian nations. In support of Cruz, Senator Orrin Hatch said earlier this week, "charging ahead with the transition now could undermine internet freedom."
However, the tech companies wrote that the transition is "ready to be executed," and that it's "imperative" that Congress not hold it up. "A global, interoperable and stable Internet is essential for our economic and national security, and we remain committed to completing the nearly twenty year transition to ... [a] model that will best serve U.S. interests."

0 comments:

Post a Comment