So it turns out the company primarily responsible for supplying and financing the AI boom is led by a guy with 60 direct reports, no succession plan and, oh by the way, got honey-trapped by a Chinese government operative who also appears to have convinced him to divert billions in chips to a US adversary in direct contravention of US law.
Which means that Jensen Huang's firing - a absolute certainty for most public companies - may not happen because it could collapse the global economy, and would include trashing the financial well-being of millions who have Nvidia stock in their retirement portfolios. You know, just in case you thought this was a straight up morality and/or national security issue. One might well ask how an entire economy became dependent on a tech company with what appears to be zero corporate governance safeguards, but that would mean you haven't been paying attention to Trump administration corruption for the past two years. Ok, that's unbelievable and unforgiveable, but here we are. What happens now? The board will 'investigate' with an eye towards 'proving' that he was a lovelorn dupe, not a cagey operator who knew what he was doing. But the investigation will really be a cover for them to begin figuring out if they can survive without him and who, if anyone, could succeed. In the process, they will almost certainly begin to impose governance standards and a succession plan as well as streamlining the reporting structure. All with an eye to hoping they can forestall further collapse, competitive challenges based on lost confidence, a financial disaster and an economic depression. Wish the Nvidia board good luck. They need it. JL
Sam Sutton and colleagues report in Politico and Connie Loizos report in Tech Crunch:
CEOs have been felled by smaller scandals than an affair with an alleged spy who routed sensitive technology to China. But there doesn’t appear to be anyone in the wings to take Huang's place. He has 60 direct reports. Depending on the results of Nvidia’s investigation, shareholder lawsuits and the political tidal wave, the board may determine Huang’s removal would be more damaging than keeping him. Nvidia’s role at the center of a massive, complex circular financing web is what makes this so tricky and terrifying. Nvidia isn’t just the biggest provider of chips driving the AI boom but the bank behind the buildout. In addition to stakes in hundreds of smaller startups, Nvidia has invested in OpenAI, Anthropic, xAI, CoreWeave. It signed agreements mobilizing more than $500 billion over time, and could backstop a quarter of it. The bigger test comes when Nvidia’s employees, customers, and partners, and millions of Americans with Nvidia in their 401(k) plans, have to decide whether an AI economy built on Huang judgement makes sense.