The more we learn about the brain and personality and moods, the more we begin to understand how policies driven purely by traditional considerations of organizational management may, in fact, cause enterprises and the people in them to underachieve.
The reality is that performance is influenced by a host of factors not explicitly quantitative, but which may have a direct, causal impact on operational and financial outcomes. As the following article explains, moods, like so many other factors that affect behavior, are not random. Policies designed to reflect data about people's response to time of day or year, to weather, light or heat may improve productivity. Those that ignore such considerations may not.
The larger point is that enhancing knowledge about human factors and then acting on what is learned may be among the most cost-effective means improving both employees' experience and the probability of achieving desired organizational outcomes. JL
Michael Grothaus reports in Fast Company:
Empirical evidence has shown negative mood is associated with reduced cognitive performance and flexibility. Understanding when negative moods happen most often could help boost productivity in every office in the country.