Uber has generated a massive valuation
- and an equally astonishing deficit - which some experts say may be the largest in startup history.
The market cap is based on the assumption that Uber can drive all competitors out of business and dominate its 'industry' (however that might be defined) through deft use of technology, innovation and legal challenges to the existing order.
But as the following article suggests, the fact that its entrepreneurial genius has yet to generate profits - and is unlikely to do so anytime soon - as well as the fact that plenty of competitors are still hanging around may mean that structural impediments to its model assure that it will never deliver on its financial promise. JL
Hubert Horan reports in Naked Capitalism:
Uber’s huge valuation was always predicated on global dominance. If Uber’s valuation and dominance were to be welfare enhancing, Uber’s efficiency and
competitive advantages would be overwhelming, and there would
need to be clear evidence of Uber’s ability to generate large profits
and consumer welfare benefits out of these advantages. The question becomes why haven’t these “disruptive innovations” yet produced competitive cost advantages or profits?