The outcomes from the application of the technology appear to be reliable. So far.
Despite the use of finger prints, facial recognition, voice recognition, the use of social media to deliver legal documents and other tech innovations in legal settings, the question is to what degree society is prepared to trust this latest, even more intrusive innovation to assist in judging guilt or innocence. JL
Heather Mongilio reports in PBS:
It’s not a question of whether neuroscientists can detect if someone is
lying using a fMRI but whether the court system is willing to let the
technology in. Experiments suggest that the fMRI machines can detect lies. “For any algorithm-based lie detection that could lead to
conviction or acquittal, […] it should be an aid to
conviction or acquittal, not the decider. It should not take
away the prerogative of judge and jury.”