So, Who's Going to Keep Your Essential 50 Year Old Software Running?

Gotta admit, the longish sideburns are kind of a hip touch.

Sure, the equipment is old - love those punchcards on the shelf to the right! - but other than that, a bunch of geeky white guys playing with machines isnt all that different from your garden variety startup anywhere in the contemporary world.

However, this does raise a tricky question: as happy as everyone is to see the Boomers finally displaying some evidence of a willingness to let go, just who do we think is going to run, maintain, and fix all those legacy systems they have bequeathed us? Especially given the fact, as the following article explains, that Cobol and Fortran and some of those old systems that were cutting edge during the Nixon administration are even older than the oldest programmers currently available who have heard of them, let alone understand how they work.

Yes, despite a couple of decades of talk about knowledge transfer, tacit knowledge and organizational effectiveness we are running into the reality that for many enterprises, that was a lot of happy talk without much structure or budget attached to it. And now those old fat guys with the gray ponytails are leaving and no one is even teaching this stuff anymore. Yikes!

But before we panic and call in McKinsey at $30K an hour, let's remember that we got kind of overexcited about that whole Y2K thing as well. There is a fix for this, but be prepared for the reality that it may entail rehiring some of those aging dudes at rates that might approximate what they would have made had we not rightsized their pay and benefit packages back in the 80s...JL

Harold Sirkin reports in Business Week:

Companies are still using programs written in such software languages as Cobol and Fortran that were considered “cutting edge” 50 years ago. The trouble is, an estimated one third to one

half of all Cobol and Fortran programmers are at least 50 years old, and today’s generation of developers is using newer programming.

It’s hard to believe that most of the technology we take for granted is just a generation or so old. Most of us carry more computing power in our pockets or handbags than a state-of-the-art office or factory possessed during the Reagan era, when the Microsoft (MSFT) operating system (MS-DOS) was first coming into use.
With generational change, however, comes a generational challenge: The baby boomers that brought us the computer revolution, developing the products and programs we now rely on, are retiring.
But many companies are still using programs written in such software languages as Cobol and Fortran that were considered “cutting edge” 50 years ago. Indeed, the trade publication Computerworld has reported that more than half of the companies they surveyed are still developing new Cobol programs.

The trouble is, an estimated one-third to one-half of all Cobol and Fortran programmers are at least 50 years old, and today’s generation of software developers is using newer programming languages, creating a skills gap for many businesses.
Smart companies have recruitment and succession plans, of course. What they don’t have is access to an adequate supply of workers with the technical expertise they need.
That’s a problem. Computer technology plays a critical role in virtually every company and industry and virtually every activity, from payroll, production, and supply-chain management to product design and development. Add to this the multiplying volume of code, the mounting technical requirements, the growing demand for technologies tailored to specific applications, and the increasingly complex ways in which code is used, and you realize how critically important software talent has become.

Software talent is also hard to come by. In 2012, for example, the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) reported that demand for software engineers in the U.S. outpaced supply by 35,000 positions. The gap between the supply of and demand for software talent is only going to get wider. “Demand is expected to grow at more than 20 percent per year through 2022—a six-fold increase,” according to a new Boston Consulting Group report titled “Code Wars”.
Fast-rising demand is just one problem. From a management standpoint, the issue is more complex, because software, like most everything else, has become a world of specialization, with the largest shortfalls looming in the areas of computer security, enterprise applications, systems networking, and storage.
The security field presents an especially daunting challenge, as eBay (EBAY), Target (TGT), and others have learned this past year, with some 200,000 software security positions currently unfilled in the U.S.

Meeting America’s needs for software talent will require a large-scale effort, involving both the boardroom and the classroom. In the near term, the report suggests, companies’ best bet is to make the most of existing talent through training, retraining, and providing attractive career paths for software talent.
Longer term, options include the use of third-party talent; collaborating with local universities, where possible, to create a talent pipeline; and building “in-house software organizations” in established tech centers. Wal-Mart Stores (WMT), for instance, has opened two e-commerce offices in Silicon Valley. A number of major manufacturers also are setting up shop there.
A big part of the challenge will be to show coming generations that working with computer technology is cool. As John Diaz reported recently in the San Francisco Chronicle, that’s something they’re starting to take seriously in Silicon Valley. Companies everywhere need to do likewise. Their success could depend on it.