Three of Russia's most prominent allies - Syria's Assad, Venezuela's Maduro and now Iran's Khamenei - have fallen in just over a year, largely due to US intervention - and none of them received crucial support from Moscow to prevent that outcome.
The question that now arises is whether the stalled, and arguably failed, Russian invasion of Ukraine has so reduced the Kremlin's ability to act elsewhere in the world that it is no longer a significant global threat, let alone power. This, in turn, raises questions about Putin's ability to hang on. With his military might revealed to less impactful than long feared, what does Russia have to offer anyone else besides weaponry that has been mostly outperformed by NATOs' and oil available from other sources? And this, combined with Russia's demonstrably declining economic fortunes, raises the specter of Russian military and political leaders wondering if they might be better off without Putin. JL
Martin Fornusek reports in the Kyiv Independent:
Russia's image as a reliable ally just suffered another blow as Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei was killed in US-Israeli strikes. "(Bashar) Assad, (Nicolas) Maduro, and now Khamenei. Putin has lost three of his closest pals in little more than a year. The domino of deposed dictators continues, and Putin's fall one day is inevitable." While Iran has provided Russia with weapons for its war against Ukraine, Tehran's has benefitted from Moscow's know-how for quashing domestic dissent during the crackdown on anti-regime protests. (But) "Russia is entangled in the Ukrainian war and already struggling. It's not like Russia has all these resources to fight many fronts."