Stanford University released its report on the state of AI yesterday, widely considered the definitive take on trends, performance, education and all related indices.
There is a wealth of data in the report, much of which is available online, but two notable issues stand out. The first is that China and the US are clearly in the lead in most categories, now almost equal, with the US maintaining a slight lead. The other is that the embrace of AI in all fields continues to grow, but for the time being, PhDs in various sciences continue to outperform AI by a significant degree - approximately double - in multistep workflows. This will probably not be permanent, but it does add to the considerable body of evidence suggesting that AI's global dominance is likely to take longer than Silicon Valley would have the rest of the world believe. JL
Nicola Jones reports in Nature:
Many researchers have started to rely on AI ‘agents’ that autonomously carry out actions including scientific workflows, but the report is skeptical about their performance. AI agents still struggle to reliably perform multistep workflows, it reports, with the best AI agents scoring roughly half as well as human specialists with PhDs. “Agents are wonderful, but we are still far from a place where we use them effectively.” (Despite that) in 2025, more than 80,000 papers, preprints and other types of publication in the natural sciences — which includes life, physical and Earth sciences — mentioned AI, 26% more than in 2024. The subcategory of physical sciences had the largest number of publications that mention AI (33,000). The Earth sciences category had the highest percentage (9%).