Trump's admiration for him remains a strategic asset - perhaps his only other being Xi's belief that China must support Russia to further its own ambitions. But even Trump and Xi see the current failure and looming exposure. The only question now is whether Putin can devise an end to the war that does not also entail an end to his power and, probably, his life. JL
Mick Ryan reports in the Lowy Institute:
Mick Ryan reports in the Lowy Institute:
Putin, a leader who expected to take Kyiv in days, and who four years on is losing troops he cannot replace while his economy stalls and his standing erodes, is managing a slow defeat. On the battlefield, the momentum as moved in Ukraine's favor. In an age of open-source transparency, where anyone can follow the front line as well as nightly drone exchanges, it is hard to sell a story of advance when the data shows stagnation and constant long-range strikes by Ukraine. Russia’s disinformation machine is still busy, but it finds less purchase. Mass is not strength. Russia brought more people and more tanks but could not learn and adapt as fast as Ukraine, while Ukraine’s edge has come from bottom-up innovation and the speed with which a good idea reaches the front. Institutional adaptability has been the decisive military quality of this war.























