Technology was once associated with a linear, engineering-based mindset that was expected to stifle intellectual, philosophical and artistic life, but has, instead, nourished them.
Television's once 'vast wasteland' is being supplanted by an exponentially expanding variety of new shows and formats. Rather than being killed off by ebooks, print editions are coming back, as are the independent bookstores that nurtured them.
These two examples illustrate the ways in which technology has been adopted by - and has adapted to - the demand for greater creativity in thought and deed. The reasons have to do with relative rises in education and communication among a diverse array of individuals and broader populations whose cultural, social and economic diversity is exposing ideas, theories, arguments, biases and passions to others who might not otherwise have ever heard, watched or seen them. The result is a ferment which is stimulating rather than suppressing the creative impulses that lead to innovation in thought and action across the socio-economic spectrum.
The challenge is that keeping those impulses flowing, however disruptive and uncomfortable they may sometimes be, requires support, protection, tolerance and investment at the social, institutional and individual level so that the fruits of this revolution may continue to flow. JL
Laura Otis reports in Psychology Today:
Thinking that people stare at their smartphones because they’re
interested in phones is like thinking that scientists study Drosophila genetics because they’re interested in fruit-flies. Artists have to learn the rules of their domains before they can break
them, and their innovations must be accepted as valuable by experts in
their fields. Creativity must be nourished and challenged, and it thrives because of cultures and technologies, not in spite of them.